Archive for September, 2010

Swing and a miss: Chevron PR efforts can’t erase stain of Ecuador pollution

By Mike G.
Thursday, September 30th, 2010

Rainforest Action Network, Change Chevron banner

For a big company like Chevron, image is everything. And when a company as big as Chevron dumps over 18 billion gallons of toxic oil waste into a pristine rainforest, leading to the deaths of over 1,400 people and imperiling the health and wellbeing of tens of thousands more, that company’s reputation justifiably suffers.

The obvious way to repair your damaged image is to clean up your mess. We’re all expected to clean up after ourselves, and behemoth corporations are no exception. Chevron, however, seems never to have learned that life lesson. Instead of cleaning up after itself, the company just invests in PR to clean up its image.

For instance, the company is sponsoring numerous professional sports teams to try and associate the Chevron name with good ol’ American pursuits such as baseball and basketball instead of the toxic mess the company is more widely known for. Now that’s what I call a swing and a miss…

Our own hometown heroes the San Francisco Giants are one of the teams Chevron sponsors to protect the way its brand is perceived by everyday Americans even as it refuses to protect the lives of Ecuadorians. Chevron doesn’t just stop with the Giants, other teams whose good reputation the company is seeking to piggyback off of are the LA Dodgers and the New Orleans Hornets.

With the Giants making a bid for the playoffs (yeah we’re fans), and AT&T Park being right down the street, we decided to take ourselves out to the ballgame and send Chevron a message. It was a warm, sunny day out today, which was good news for everyone who came out to the daytime ball game. It also wasn’t terribly windy, which was good news for our banner.

Chevron has a huge advertisement with happy, smiling cars on the left field wall of AT&T Park. So we made ourselves a banner — hewing a bit closer to reality than Chevron’s ad, it read “Clean Up Ecuador Oil Spill” — and hung it on the left field wall, right next to Chevron’s ad.

The crowd loved it. Some folks even took up a chant of “Let them hang it” when security came and took our banner down.

Chevron can’t use PR as a pinch-hitter to get out of its mess. It’s time for Chevron to step up to the plate and clean up Ecuador.

New website tracks human rights impact of oil pollution in Ecuador, Nigeria, and USA

By Mike G.
Wednesday, September 29th, 2010

A piece run by CBS News back in July asserted:

“If you live on the Gulf Coast, welcome to the real world of oil — and just know that you’re not alone.  In the Niger Delta and the Ecuadorian Amazon, among other places, your emerging hell has been the living hell of local populations for decades.”

This is just one of several articles pointing out the parallels between the Gulf oil spill and Chevron’s toxic legacy in the Ecuadorean Amazon, many of which were cited in the new “Human rights impacts of oil pollution” web portal created by the Business & Human Rights Resource Centre. The site focuses on the toll oil pollution has taken on the people and ecosystems of the US Gulf Coast, Ecuador, and Nigeria.

The parallels between the situations on the Gulf Coast and in Ecuador are fairly obvious. In both cases, a fragile ecosystem was catastrophically impacted, which in turn had a drastic impact on the lives and livelihoods of local community members — many of whom are Indigenous peoples who have lived off of those particular ecosystems for generations.


Crude oil contaminates an open toxic pool in the the Ecuadorean Amazon rainforest near Lago Agrio. It was abandoned by Texaco (now Chevron) after oil drilling operations ended in 1990 and was never remediated. Photo by Caroline Bennett / Rainforest Action Network

In Ecuador, as the Business & Human Rights Resource Centre explains: “The oil contamination of soil and water sources used by residents for agriculture, fishing, bathing and drinking has allegedly caused a sharp increase in serious illnesses among local people in parts of Sucumbios state in Ecuador. It has also allegedly displaced residents and left many people without their traditional sources of income.” There are many great resources if you’re looking for more information on how local communities have been affected, including impacts on their health and livelihood and cultural way of life.

The biggest difference between the two cases of extreme oil pollution, of course, is that the Gulf oil spill was more or less an accident (say what you will about BP’s culpability given its lax attitude toward worker and environmental safety), whereas the billions of gallons of oil and toxic water still sitting in open, unlined pits in the rainforests of Ecuador were dumped there intentionally. BP has set up a $20 billion fund to compensate those affected by its oil spill. Chevron, on the other hand, refuses to take responsibility.

Business & Human Rights Resource Centre’s portal is a great resource if you’re looking for more background on the case against Chevron. If you want to help call on Chevron to clean up its mess in Ecuador, you could do worse than retweet this blog post to make sure as many people see it as possible.

When is Chevron Going to Do the Right Thing in Ecuador?

By Nick
Tuesday, September 28th, 2010

This morning the Change Chevron Campaign made a visit to the Chamber of Commerce’s Corporate Citizen Conference. The reason for our visit was that Chevron’s General Manager of Corporate Public Policy, Gary Fisher, was speaking at a plenary session on “partnership.” Mr. Fisher was predictably sent by Chevron to parade around their public partnerships and corporate responsibility projects. Unfortunately you’ll never see Mr. Fisher, or Chevron, parading around their private partnerships or the reality of their projects. This is why we were there to make sure people not only heard Chevron’s rhetoric, but they heard people’s reality.

Prior to the plenary session we distributed copies of “The True Cost of Chevron” throughout the main conference room. We wanted people to be primed on Chevron’s global pollution before Gary Fisher even began his opening statement. These reports, full of community testimonies about living with Chevron’s pollution, no doubt leave an impression on anyone who flips through them.
(* the Chamber of Commerce and Chevron were furious that these materials made it into their “corporate citizenship” bonanza, even going as far as threatening to fine Rainforest Action Network $10,000 for distributing materials. Seems the Chamber of Commerce is a allergic to truth telling as Chevron is.)

I wonder what was going through Gary Fisher’s mind as he walked out to see a room full of people reading this report?

However, rather than the reports, it was the attendance by Maria Lya Ramos, Director of the Change Chevron campaign, that had Chevron squirming it their seats.

During the question and answer period Ms. Ramos took her allotted time to speak to Chevron’s refusal to assume responsibility of their oil disaster and pollution in Ecuador. Though interrupted more than once by security (for asking a critical question no-less) she still put Gary Fisher and Chevron squarely on the hot seat in front of their distinguished crowd at the Chamber of Commerce.

“It’s not right for a multi-billion dollar company to operate, extract for oil in a developing country, dump billions of gallons of toxic sludge, leave those people to sicken and die, while making a profit. But this is exactly what Chevron did in Ecuador…. So Mr. Fisher, when you said that a corporate-public partnership is not based on charity, I think you’re right. It’s based on transparency, accountability, and responsibility. And if Chevron were a responsible company, it would clean up its massive oil pollution in Ecuador’s Amazon. So my question for you, Mr. Fisher, is when is Chevron going to do the right thing and clean up the Ecuadorean Amazon? People are suffering. More than 1400 people have died of oil-related cancers.”

In the video above you’ll see Chevron remains totally silent, having no real answers to as why they continue to delay solutions and refuse to  clean up the soil and drinking water pollution of the communities they once operated in as Texaco.

We were not surprised Chevron didn’t have an answer as to their responsibilities in Ecuador. They have never had an answer. Rather than answers and solutions for these communities, Chevron relies on distracting public relations and suspicious legal maneuvers to drag out the lawsuit holding them accountable to nearly 18 years.

It’s obvious again by today’s event that Chevron will always have plenty to say, as long as it has nothing to do with their pollution and accountability in Ecuador. That’s why it’s up to us to keep talking about it and keep Chevron’s responsibility in the spotlight.

Join Us on the 10/10/10 Day of Climate Action

By Nick
Monday, September 20th, 2010

On 10/10/10, RAN is joining our friends at 350.org, thousands of people around the world, and you for a global work party. 

We’re going to inspire our leaders, and even some of the country’s dirtiest corporations, to get to work on the climate crisis. In true RAN style, we’ll be targeting one of the country’s biggest and baddest corporations: Chevron.

Join us on 10/10/10 to demand that Chevron get to work cleaning up its dirty oil pollution. From Chevron’s pollution of communities living near its Richmond, California refinery, to the oil waste it is still fighting tooth and nail not to clean up in Ecuador’s rainforest, Chevron is a danger to people’s health and the climate. With your help on 10/10/10, RAN will take over Chevron gas stations across the country to show this reckless polluter how to get to work and clean up its act.

We’ll send you a toolkit to make it really easy. We need help delivering letters to station owners, passing out fliers to customers, holding banners, and doing “Clean Up Chevron” street theater! So grab your broom and the rest of your cleaning supplies because we’re going to need your help to stage mock-clean ups at stations nationwide.

Mike from Los Angeles is planning an electric vehicle demonstration at his local Chevron. The sky’s the limit on creative non-violent actions you can take to interrupt Chevron’s business as usual on 10/10/10. 

Joining us on 10/10/10 is simple.

1 Sign-up and describe your action 


2 Tell your friends and neighbors to mark their calendars 


3 Head to your local Chevron on 10/10/10


4 Bring your “cleaning supplies” and a healthy dose of fun 

See you at the stations on 10/10/10!

Shock: Experts say 10,000 Ecuadoreans may die by 2080 because of Chevron’s pollution.

By Nick
Friday, September 17th, 2010

Crossposted from Itsgettinghotinhere.org

Shockwaves rippled through the world’s largest environmental lawsuit today. A new damages assessment has been submitted in the lawsuit pitting 30,000 Indigenous peoples and local farmers against the global oil giant Chevron.

The damages assessment finds that because of factors still persisting in the Ecuadorean rainforest from Chevron’s pollution, nearly 10,000 Ecuadoreans are at significant risk of dying from cancer by the year 2080, even if Chevron cleans up the toxic contamination in the next ten years.

“The information in this submission is highly significant because it reflects clearly that there is a terrible oil-related disaster in Ecuador in the area where Chevron operated,” said Pablo Fajardo, lead lawyer for the Amazon communities. “What these analyses make chillingly clear is that thousands of Ecuadorean citizens may well contract and die of cancer in the coming decades because of Chevron’s contamination,” he added.

This new round of assessments comes after complaints by Chevron about the original independent assessment, submitted in 2008 – which contained over 105 expert reports and more than 64,000 samples, many of which came from Chevron’s own team. Since the original assessment Chevron has invested in public relations campaigns, spy schemes, and fake media reports in an attempt to discredit the assessment, smear highly respected scientists, and derail the lawsuit.

Then recently, in a move seemly to appease Chevron, the presiding judge opened a 45-day window for both parties to submit their own damage assessments to the court. Had Chevron the basis to prove there is no contamination in Ecuador’s rainforest, the company would have pounced on the opportunity.  But it didn’t.  Instead, Chevron immediately rejected the court’s offer to compile and submit a damages assessment. Many in the legal and human rights communities found this move irreconcilable. However, those close to the lawsuit see this latest development as yet another indicator that Chevron is solely interested in delaying the trial, rather than letting the court rule on the facts of the case.

“We predict that Chevron’s bad faith will be on full display yet again. Chevron complained that it did not have an opportunity to produce its own damages assessment. But when given the opportunity, company lawyers accuse the judge of bias against Chevron and launch attacks on the justice system.” Said Fajardo

Six renowned technical and medical experts compiled the new damages assessment. Based on their findings, the damages reached $40 to 90 billion, nearly double the $27.3 billion originally determined. (The numbers are broken down in the court filing that can be found HERE.) The new numbers come after a new and more thorough examination of Chevron’s “unjust enrichment” – money saved by using sub-standard drilling practices. While operating in the region the oil company intentionally used drilling practices deficient in safety and pollution safeguards. Simply, Chevron is accused of intentionally poisoning communities to save a buck.

Marta Isabel Arrobo, 49, recalls numerous health problems she and her family have suffered living in close proximity to several toxic oil pits abandoned by Texaco (now Chevron) in the Ecuadorean Amazon rainforest. Photo by Caroline Bennett / Rainforest Action Network

It’s obvious that Chevron never had any intention of submitting a new report, its intention was to be obstructionist – resigned to the fact that anything found in any assessment will only point to the company’s liability. Chevron’s game-plan is clear: delay the trial at any cost, all the while communities continue to suffer from the pollution. As a recent DowJones article points out, Chevron won’t be able to do this forever. The end of this precedent setting trial is nearing. The entire oil industry is watching this lawsuit with guarded eye, as it will potentially set the stage for similar suits – demanding restitution for harm and negligence. It is because of this that Chevron will pull no punches as the company tries to claw its way from liability. Expect more fireworks and distraction from Chevron, as the truth continues to pin the company in a corner of accountability.

Double Trouble: Chevron’s Ecuador Gameplan Slowly Unravels Hotlist

By Nick
Thursday, September 16th, 2010

Crossposted from DailyKos

In the last two days Chevron has been hit with two developments that will surely produce lasting doubts to the legality and authenticity of Chevron’s actions in what is being called the world’s largest environmental lawsuit. Chevron has been involved in the $27.3 billion for the last 17 years. The breathtaking figure represents the expensive pollution counting for over 18 billion gallons of toxic oil waste and 15 million gallons of crude oil left in the Amazon rainforest. Chevron has vehemently denied responsibility, claiming high cancer rates and polluted drinking water is due to “poor sanitation.” However Chevron cannot, and as of yesterday now refuses to, backup any such claim.

In the last two days Chevron has been hit with two developments that will surely produce lasting doubts to the legality and authenticity of Chevron’s actions in what is being called the world’s largest environmental lawsuit. Chevron has been involved in the $27.3 billion for the last 17 years. The breathtaking figure represents the expensive pollution counting for over 18 billion gallons of toxic oil waste and 15 million gallons of crude oil left in the Amazon rainforest. Chevron has vehemently denied responsibility, claiming high cancer rates and polluted drinking water is due to “poor sanitation.” However Chevron cannot, and as of yesterday now refuses to, backup any such claim.

Yesterday Chevron was provided with the opportunity to submit to the court its own damages assessment. (Presumably to argue any discrepancies they found in the original damages assessment compiled by the court appointed expert.) Chevron in turn rejected the opportunity. A peculiar move considering Chevron has spent the last two years attacking the submission of independent damages assessment. The original assessment contained over 105 expert reports and more than 64,000 samples, many of which came from Chevron’s own team. This latest maneuver by Chevron has many in the legal and human rights world scratching their heads. However for those close to the lawsuit this latest development is seen as another indicator that Chevron is solely interested delaying the trial rather than letting the courts rule on the extent of their liability.

“We predict that Chevron’s bad faith will be on full display yet again,” said Pablo Fajardo, the lead lawyer for the Amazonian communities. “Chevron complained that it did not have an opportunity to produce its own damages assessment. But when given the opportunity, company lawyers accuse the judge of bias against Chevron and launch attacks on the justice system.” Fajardo said the Amazonian communities would submit their own damages assessment prepared by a team of scientific and medical experts to the court today.”

The new damages report submission, comes a day after another major dilemma for Chevron’s defense in Ecuador. On Wednesday a Federal Judge ordered Diego Borja, a spy video operative and former Chevron employee, to appear for a deposition in San Francisco next week.

Continue reading HERE